<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Backwards Compatability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brightscape.net/browser-backwards-compatability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brightscape.net/browser-backwards-compatability/</link>
	<description>web development &#38; internet technology for a modern generation...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Automated Browser Testing &#124; brightscape.net</title>
		<link>http://brightscape.net/browser-backwards-compatability/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Automated Browser Testing &#124; brightscape.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightscape.net/2007/08/02/browser-backwards-compatability/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] have previously discussed browser compatibility on this blog, however I recently stumbled across a great automatic way of testing multiple browsers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have previously discussed browser compatibility on this blog, however I recently stumbled across a great automatic way of testing multiple browsers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://brightscape.net/browser-backwards-compatability/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightscape.net/2007/08/02/browser-backwards-compatability/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Interesting comment Ross. I had a look at that article you mentioned. I never would've thought Safari would make it to #3. Internet Explorer continues to see a drop, I think Firefox is well and truly ingrained for serious web-users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comment Ross. I had a look at that article you mentioned. I never would&#8217;ve thought Safari would make it to #3. Internet Explorer continues to see a drop, I think Firefox is well and truly ingrained for serious web-users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://brightscape.net/browser-backwards-compatability/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightscape.net/2007/08/02/browser-backwards-compatability/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Nice post - I often think about this. Although I usually concentrate on IE, FF and Opera. Funny Jimmy says about Safari - I read this post earlier about its &lt;a href="http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200612/safaris_browser_market_share_tops_4_percent/" rel="nofollow"&gt;falling market share&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post - I often think about this. Although I usually concentrate on IE, FF and Opera. Funny Jimmy says about Safari - I read this post earlier about its <a href="http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200612/safaris_browser_market_share_tops_4_percent/">falling market share</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://brightscape.net/browser-backwards-compatability/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightscape.net/2007/08/02/browser-backwards-compatability/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Glad to see Safari's included. May Apple's endeavors to name an operating system after every species of cat continue to be fruitful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see Safari&#8217;s included. May Apple&#8217;s endeavors to name an operating system after every species of cat continue to be fruitful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
